Professor: California sees nation's least affordable electricity

Professor: California sees nation’s least affordable electricity

California is experiencing the country’s biggest hikes in electricity rates, according to new research from the Energy Institute at the Haas School of Business at University of California, Berkeley.

The research was detailed in a blog post written by an economics and business professor at the university.

According to the research, electricity rate increases have gone up by 39% between 2019 and 2025, much higher than any other state. The closest jurisdictions to California’s numbers are Maine and Washington, D.C., which are both at 37%; Maryland, 21%; New York, 20%; and New Jersey, 17%.

While there is no one single reason for why electricity has become so unaffordable across the country or state, there are a few reasons for why electricity rates in California have gone up above the national average in the last several years, according to the researcher.

“It isn’t driven primarily by the wholesale cost of electricity,” said Severin Borenstein, a UC Berkeley professor who conducted the research and wrote the blog.

“What has gone way up is the distribution costs,” Borenstein told The Center Square this week.

Distribution costs are up because of the price of responding to wildfires and paying to fix the damage of past wildfires, Borenstein said. Another driver of increased rate costs is shifting onto those who don’t have rooftop solar as the number of people who install solar power goes up, he added.

The biggest driver, Borenstein told The Center Square, is the costs of fixing wildfire damage that utility companies pass on to their customers.

“California has a law on the books that says that if utility equipment causes a wildfire, even if they were not negligent, they are still held responsible,” Borenstein said. “But if they are not negligent, they then go to the regulator and say, ‘This is the cost of doing business. We should be able to pass it through.’ And generally, they are allowed to pass it through, so that’s what’s raising rates.”

The research was published on the heels of investor-owned utility customers starting to see a base surcharge on their monthly bills that is largely meant to make electricity cheaper for those who use large amounts of electricity, while simultaneously making electricity rates higher for those who are trying to conserve energy. The per-kilowatt hour rate for customers of Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and Southern California Edison was scheduled to go down as both companies rolled out the surcharge on customers’ bills, according to previous reporting by The Center Square.

Borenstein’s research shows that as of summer 2024, electricity rates had been steady with inflation across the country. He also found the national average electricity rate had stayed relatively flat, or even gone down, between 2014 and 2024, when adjusted for inflation. During that same time frame, the median weekly earnings of many workers across the country was increasing faster than inflation, Borenstein’s research shows.

The states with the lowest electricity rate increases were Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri, Tennessee, Mississippi and North Carolina, all at 1%, according to the research.

Some states even saw rate decreases between 2019 and 2025, including Nevada, which saw a 12% electricity rate decrease; Iowa, which saw an 8% decline; Alaska, Kansas and South Carolina, which saw rates drop 6%; North Dakota and Nebraska, which saw a 5% decrease in rates; and South Dakota, which saw a 4% decrease. In Idaho, rates decreased 2%, and in New Mexico, Wyoming and New Hampshire, rates dropped 1%.

What California’s politicians say about electricity rates

“There are many different factors at play right now that are leading to higher rates in California,” said Sen. Ben Allen, chair of the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee.

“While we’re experiencing and continue to expect significant load growth, we’ve also needed to make significant investments in risk management to better protect communities from wildfires,” Allen told The Center Square via email.

Allen said utility rebates, which are paid by polluters through greenhouse gas reduction fund investments, are a tool to relieve the excessive costs many Californians see on their bills. This is only a bandage, Allen said, noting he wants to see real solutions to what drives those costs upward.

“We should be addressing perverse incentives for overbuilding utility infrastructure that provide minimal benefits, while shifting focus toward infrastructure buildout that brings more of our clean energy online,” Allen wrote to The Center Square. “It will also be important to consider how we can ensure the few corporations driving outsized load growth, such as through data centers, are paying their fair share rather than being subsidized by the average ratepayer.”

Republican legislators have also expressed concern about electricity rates soaring in California. Efforts to cap utility rates through legislation and a lack of oversight on utility programs managed by the California Public Utilities Commission have impacted ratepayers’ bills, according to lawmakers responding to The Center Square’s requests for comment.

“I represent a working-class district in Orange County, and constant utility rate increases mean incessant pressure for constituents to make ends meet,” said Assemblymember Tri Ta, R-Westminster, and a member of the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee.

“I am very concerned about the cost of utilities in California. The main driver of our high costs are public policy decisions that were made long before I joined the Legislature but am tackling now,” Ta told the Center Square via email.

Other lawmakers blame state agencies that are tasked with carrying out programs meant to help ratepayers, a Republican legislator told The Center Square.

“When we talk affordability and our utility bills, one aspect the state should focus on is the ineptitude of the California Public Utilities Commission,” Assemblymember Laurie Davies, R-Oceanside, told The Center Square in an email. “For years, the legislature has mandated certain programs, and we have no idea if they’re working or if the money is going to ratepayers as promised. I would welcome more audits of the CPUC and determine what programs work and which don’t.”

Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, D-Irvine and chair of the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee, was not available for an interview this week. Officials from the California Public Utilities Commission sent along reports via email, but did not make anyone available to answer questions.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Litchfield Park-Pool Graphic Logo

Pool Reports $26,500 Loss as District Plans for Repairs

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield Park District pool concluded its season with a significant financial loss due to unexpected repairs, and now...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.3

Litchfield Secures Marshalls Department Store with New TIF Agreement

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 Article Summary: The City Council approved a new development agreement that paves the way for a Marshalls department store to open in...
Litchfield Park-Schalk Park Graphic Logo

LBI Proposes Expansion of Schalk Field at Park Board Meeting

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: Representatives from Litchfield Baseball Inc. (LBI) presented a proposal to the Park Board to expand Schalk Field by up...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.4

Litchfield Approves $397k for Emergency Water Plant Repairs; Resident Donates $100k to Cause

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield City Council authorized nearly $400,000 in emergency expenditures to fix a catastrophic failure at the water treatment plant,...
Litchfield Park-Graphic Logo.4

Litchfield Park Board Approves 5% Tax Levy Increase

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield Park District Board voted to increase its annual property tax levy by 5 percent following a review...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield CUSD 12 for October 21, 2025

Litchfield CUSD 12 Meeting | October 21, 2025 The Litchfield Community Unit School District No. 12 Board of Education met on Tuesday, October 21, 2025, to review the annual audit,...
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Principals Present Improvement Plans Focused on Growth and Attendance

Litchfield CUSD 12 Meeting | October 21, 2025 Article Summary: Litchfield building administrators presented their 90-day School Improvement Plans (SIP) to the Board of Education, outlining specific targets for reading...
Litchfield School Logo Graphic.5

Litchfield Board Approves Strategic Planning Contract and Truck Driver Training Site

Litchfield CUSD 12 Meeting | October 21, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield School Board authorized a new strategic planning process led by external consultants and approved a partnership to establish...
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Litchfield School Board Accepts Clean Financial Audit; Auditors Advise Monitoring Benefit Funds

Litchfield CUSD 12 Meeting | October 21, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield School Board accepted the annual financial audit for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, which returned a...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield City Council for Oct. 16, 2025

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 16, 2025 The Litchfield City Council convened on Thursday, Oct. 16, 2025, tackling significant infrastructure and financial issues. The meeting was dominated by discussions...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.4

Litchfield Approves Contract for State-Funded Auto Theft Task Force Inspector

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 16, 2025 Article Summary: The City Council approved a contract for services with Ryan Gorman, who will serve as an Inspector for the Illinois...
Litchfield Logo.1

Council Rejects Water Bill Credit for Mt. Olive, Citing Fairness to Local Residents

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 16, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield City Council unanimously voted against a request from the City of Mt. Olive for a $3,675 water billing...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.3

Litchfield Council Authorizes $183K in Emergency Water Plant Repairs Following System Failure

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 16, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield City Council waived competitive bidding to authorize over $183,000 in emergency repairs to the city’s water treatment plant...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield City Council for Oct. 2, 2025

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 2, 2025 The Litchfield City Council met on Thursday, Oct. 2, 2025, addressing the recent water system boil order, hunting regulations, and public safety...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.4

Litchfield Approves New Police Vehicle Upfit and Pursuit of Full-Time Chief

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Oct. 2, 2025 Article Summary: The council approved the outfitting of a new Dodge Durango for the ordinance officer and authorized the Illinois Association of...