Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to Illinois public transport gun ban
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to decide whether individuals can carry firearms on public transportation.
The court declined to take up Schoenthal v. Raoul, which challenges an Illinois law banning citizens from carrying firearms on public transportation. Three Illinois residents challenged the ban, arguing it violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights.
“There is no historical tradition of banning law-abiding citizens from possessing firearms in crowded public locations where they may be more vulnerable,” lawyers wrote in a petition to the court.
Illinois requires gun owners to acquire a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card and a concealed carry license in order to carry a firearm in public. However, the state bans individuals from carrying a loaded or unsecured firearm onto buses, trains or any other type of public transportation that is paid for in part or whole by public funds.
Kwame Raoul, Illinois’ attorney general, argued the prohibition on guns in public transportation is consistent with the nation’s historical tradition limiting firearms in sensitive places, like court rooms, schools and polling places.
“Like historical sensitive places, public transit features ‘confined areas with a high density of people,’ making firearms ‘exceptionally dangerous,’” Raoul wrote.
Latest News Stories
Trump requests $6.2M in attorney fees from Fulton County
U.S. economy added more than 500,000 jobs in 2025
Trump eyes striking Mexican cartels
Robots and AI dominate major trade show in Las Vegas
Mike Tyson, Ric Flair accuse ex-CBD products partners of $50M+ fraud
WATCH: Newsom says he’s an alternate to White House ‘chaos’ in his final State of the State
Prosecutor calls Newsom ‘king of fraud’ for oversight failures
Seattle’s new mayor has no plans to look into possible local daycare fraud
Litchfield Council Rejects One-Way Street Proposal for Post Office
Foreign national charged with having gun near ICE agents in Chicago
Tariffs sink Canadian couples’ long-running e-commerce operation
Attorneys file request to Supreme Court over gender secrecy