Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Event Calendar
Latest News Stories
Litchfield Switches Insurance Carriers to IML-RMA, Anticipates Savings and Lower Deductibles
Finance Committee: Spreadsheet Error Forces $1 Million Budget Correction; Committee Balances FY26 Plan
Litchfield Schools Earn “Commendable” Ratings; High School Nears Top Tier
Litchfield Limits Winter Lake Draw Down to 3 Feet, Citing Erosion and Water Quality Concerns
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Montgomery County Board for October 14, 2025
Litchfield School Board Sets Truth in Taxation Hearing, Estimates 9% Levy Increase
Construction Quality and Insurance Rates Addressed by County Board
Board Doubles Solar and Wind Application Fees, Rejects No-Bid Land Deal
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield Park District Board for Nov. 5, 2025
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield City Council for Nov. 6, 2025
Affrunti Resigns as State’s Attorney; Board Appoints Brian Shaw as Successor
City Restructures Finance Department, Hires Consultant and New Coordinator