Mike Tyson, Ric Flair accuse ex-CBD products partners of $50M+ fraud

Mike Tyson, Ric Flair accuse ex-CBD products partners of $50M+ fraud

Spread the love

Former heavyweight boxing champion Mike Tyson and WWE professional wrestler Ric Flair are leading a lawsuit they say is worth at least $50 million, claiming their supposed partners in licensing cannabis products instead made them victims of a racketeering and fraud scheme through which four men allegedly embezzled millions of dollars.

Tyson and Flair, through lawyers with the Chicago firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher, filed their complaint Dec. 19 in federal court in Chicago, with two corporate entities as fellow plaintiffs: Miami-based hemp company LGNDS and CARMA HoldCo, which the complaint identifies as “a global branding company formed in Chicago that specializes in licensing celebrity brands” that sits at the heart of the lawsuit.

Named defendants include Chad Bronstein, who was CARMA’S board chairman and then president; CEO Adam Wilks; Nicole Cosby, who was a founding board member before going to work for CARMA as chief legal and licensing officer; and shareholder James Case, a longtime Bronstein associate.

“Throughout their time at CARMA, Bronstein and Wilks treated CARMA as their own personal piggy bank, using more than $1 million to pay for unauthorized personal travel on private jets, costs associated with Bronstein’s personal yacht, renovations to Bronstein’s personal residence, a mortgage payment for Wilks’ personal residence, and lavish entertainment expenditures for Wilks, including exorbitantly priced meals and travel expenditures, as well as excessive and unapproved compensation and bonuses,” the complaint alleged. “What’s more, Bronstein and Wilks entered into unauthorized agreements on CARMA’s behalf with third parties, which resulted in financial losses and liabilities to CARMA but lined the defendants’ pockets.”

Flair and Tyson said the defendants were repeatedly deceptive and fraudulent, naming as a fellow victim the musical artist known as Future. The lawsuit claims the celebrities signed licensing deals with CARMA, but alleged Bronstein and Cosby instead sold the rights to LGNDS and other unauthorized buyers. Tyson specifically said his CARMA contract granted him express approval over personal appearances, but alleged Wilks nonetheless inked contracts obligating Tyson to several events across the country.

“Bronstein, and later Wilks, demanded that the principal of LGNDS purchase Rolex watches worth at least $50,000 or else they would cancel LGNDS’ contracts with CARMA,” the complaint alleged. “On another occasion, Wilks received an identical Rolex watch worth in excess of $50,000 from the owner of an Amsterdam-based coffee shop which received a license to use Tyson’s likeness without having to pay CARMA’s customary $250,000 upfront licensing fee. Further, Bronstein and defendant James Case — a longtime associate and co-conspirator of Bronstein — demanded that LGNDS give Case a 10% ownership interest in LGNDS, free of charge, as a precondition for LGNDS’ licensing agreements with CARMA.”

The complaint further alleged Bronstein and Wilks had CARMA issue them hundreds of thousands of common shares, and said, although they knew the company to be worth $80 million, they told investors the value exceeded $120 million, then sold their shares for seven-figure profits.

“When certain individuals close to Bronstein began to take note of his conduct, he took measures to silence their criticism, including by using CARMA’s funds to fund paychecks so the critics could hold ‘ghost jobs’ at CARMA,” the complaint alleged. “These pseudo-jobs allowed Bronstein’s would-be critics to collect a paycheck from CARMA without the expectation that they perform any work.”

Tyson and Flair also alleged the same defendants are running similar schemes with Real American Beer, a product marketed around iconography of the late Hulk Hogan, and Real American Freestyle, a wrestling promotion that also had Hogan’s involvement and a broadcasting deal with FOX Nation.

The 76-page complaint include allegations about conduct as far back as Bronstein’s 2019 launch of the marketing technology company Fyllo, and his life sciences company Wesana Health, formed in 2020 with former pro hockey player Daniel Carcillo as a partner. It claims Tyson was a founding partner of CARMA and detailed the intellectual property licensing agreements for his name and likeness as well as the start of Bronstein’s relationship with Flair and the incorporation of Ric Flair Drip, which the retired pro wrestler “believed as a consolidation of his intellectual property for his benefit.”

Instead, according to the complaint, Bronstein and Wilks gave Flair only 47% of the shares in the company, while they each held 16%. Then, without telling CARMA’s board how much they owned, the men had CARMA buy 30% of Ric Flair Drip — Flair allegedly got no money from the deal — then had CARMA buy the remaining 70% interest in September 2022, not with cash, but an equity stake in CARMA.

“Bronstein and Wilks justified this self-dealing as simply right-sizing their ownership of CARMA, as they felt they deserved compensation above what was approved by the board of directors,” the complaint alleged.

CARMA’s executive team asked Bornstein to resign in November 2023, but the complaint alleged Wilks “followed Bronstein’s patterns of fraud and self-dealing” until the board removed him as well, with allegations about his improper roles in business relationships with companies like Green Success, a German distributor of cannabis products, and Mr. Charlie’s, a plant-based fast food company in Beverly Hills, among others.

In all the complaint brings 21 counts, including violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, conspiracy, money laundering, wire fraud, extortion, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and securities fraud. In addition to a jury trial, the plaintiffs seek at least $50 million, including treble damages, compensation for legal expenses and forced disgorgement of “all ill-gotten gains,” along with pre- and post-judgment interest.

Leave a Comment





Latest News Stories

Litchfield Logo Graphic.3

Litchfield Limits Winter Lake Draw Down to 3 Feet, Citing Erosion and Water Quality Concerns

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 20, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield City Council has decided to limit the annual winter draw down of Lake Lou Yaeger to three feet...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Montgomery County Board for October 14, 2025

Montgomery County Board Meeting | October 14, 2025 Overall Meeting SummaryThe Montgomery County Board’s October meeting was marked by significant financial and personnel developments. The meeting began with the acceptance...
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Litchfield School Board Sets Truth in Taxation Hearing, Estimates 9% Levy Increase

Litchfield CUSD 12 Meeting | November 18, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield Community Unit School District No. 12 Board of Education has approved a tentative tax levy that estimates a...
montgomery county Graphic Logo

Construction Quality and Insurance Rates Addressed by County Board

Montgomery County Board Meeting | October 14, 2025 Article Summary: Following a builder's complaint about workmanship at the new Highway Department facility, officials assured the public that final payments are...
solar panels photovoltaics in solar farm

Board Doubles Solar and Wind Application Fees, Rejects No-Bid Land Deal

Montgomery County Board Meeting | October 14, 2025 Article Summary: The County Board approved significant fee increases for solar and wind energy applications and rejected a land purchase option from...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield Park District Board for Nov. 5, 2025

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 The Litchfield Park District Board met on Wednesday, November 5, 2025, to conduct its regular monthly business. The board authorized a...
Meeting Briefs

Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield City Council for Nov. 6, 2025

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 The Litchfield City Council met on Thursday, Nov. 6, 2025, addressing critical infrastructure needs and economic development. The meeting was headlined by...
montgomery county Graphic Logo.4

Affrunti Resigns as State’s Attorney; Board Appoints Brian Shaw as Successor

Montgomery County Board Meeting | October 14, 2025 Article Summary: Montgomery County State’s Attorney Andrew Affrunti has resigned, and the board has appointed First Assistant Brian Shaw to fill the...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.4

City Restructures Finance Department, Hires Consultant and New Coordinator

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 Article Summary: The City Council approved a restructuring of its finance department, creating a new internal coordinator position, moving the Deputy Clerk...
Litchfield Park-Plummer Park Graphic Logo

Trunk or Treat Draws Over 1,000 Attendees

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: The Park District's annual Trunk or Treat event saw massive turnout, prompting officials to plan for increased food supplies...
montgomery county Graphic Logo.2

Budget Error Erases Surplus, Creates $920,000 Deficit for Montgomery County

Montgomery County Board Meeting | October 14, 2025 Article Summary: A clerical error discovered in the tentative budget has transformed a projected surplus into a near-million-dollar deficit. The County Board...
Litchfield Logo.1

City Clarifies State-Mandated Lead Service Line Letters

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 Article Summary: City officials addressed confusion regarding recent letters sent to residents about lead and galvanized water service lines. The notices were...
Litchfield Park-Pool Graphic Logo

Pool Reports $26,500 Loss as District Plans for Repairs

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: The Litchfield Park District pool concluded its season with a significant financial loss due to unexpected repairs, and now...
Litchfield Logo Graphic.3

Litchfield Secures Marshalls Department Store with New TIF Agreement

Litchfield City Council Meeting | Nov. 6, 2025 Article Summary: The City Council approved a new development agreement that paves the way for a Marshalls department store to open in...
Litchfield Park-Schalk Park Graphic Logo

LBI Proposes Expansion of Schalk Field at Park Board Meeting

Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025 Article Summary: Representatives from Litchfield Baseball Inc. (LBI) presented a proposal to the Park Board to expand Schalk Field by up...