Litchfield Park Board Approves 5% Tax Levy Increase
Litchfield Park District Board Meeting | Nov. 5, 2025
Article Summary: The Litchfield Park District Board voted to increase its annual property tax levy by 5 percent following a review of the district’s financial needs for the upcoming fiscal year.
2025 Tax Levy Key Points:
-
Levy Increase: The board approved a 5 percent increase in the tax levy compared to the previous year.
-
Vote: The measure passed following a roll call vote.
-
Timing: The decision was made for the 2025 tax year.
The Litchfield Park District Board on Wednesday, November 5, 2025, approved the district’s tax levy for the 2025 tax year, authorizing a 5 percent increase over the previous year’s amount.
Commissioner Brian Kulick led the financial discussion, stating that it was time to review the levy. He noted the 5 percent raise before the board moved to a vote. A roll call vote was taken, and the levy passed.
This financial decision sets the revenue framework for the district’s operations in the coming year.
Latest News Stories
County Secures $450 Per Acre for Farm Lease, Approves Courthouse Repairs
Dry Conditions Fuel Rash of Fires Across Region; Litchfield Shed Fire Spreads to 25 Acres
Wildflower Subdivision Final Plat Approved; TIF Impact Explained
Committee Recommends Significant Salary Increase for County Elected Officials
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Litchfield Board of Education for February 17, 2026
Former Russell School to Become Wrestling Training Center
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Montgomery County Board for Jan. 13, 2026
Council Hires Robert Carpenter as Police Chief in Split Vote
District Pre-Buys Technology to Beat Tariffs, Pays for Major Inspections
Board Considers Property Purchase for Recovery Court Expansion
Day after Supreme Court ruling, Trump says he will raise tariffs to 15%
Advocate: Bipartisan support for IL CO2 pipeline eminent domain prohibition
Groups file brief in support of ending post-Election Day ballot counting
Business groups seek quick tariff refunds after Supreme Court ruling